Hi,
Can someone please suggest me some test cases for my solution for SHTARR.I tried random cases with some AC solution but I get all my results same.
If anyone wants I can share my test case generator with them 
Thanks!
I believe the trouble is with your lower bound function. In query function, you need two indices, it and it2 which (as i understand) are storing index of element greater than r and l respectively.
For it2 variable, you ought to find the index lower than or equal to r while for it variable, you ought to find the index where element is lower than l.
While ur solution will work in many cases, it might fail (as i believe it did) for cases where the block contains l, other than the start block.
Your code will work well for N<=1000 because in this case, only your start function would be called.
I don’t believe anyone here would be able to actually provide test cases except problem setter/tester because the test case your code will fail are test cases with N>1000.
Hope this helps
Hey, @taran_1407 the indices it & it2 are actually supposed to store indices with element just greater than or equal to l or r respectively.If you wish you can just have a look at the quick explanation of editorial.
And I even can’t verify a test case with n>1000 but for the sake of this we can just generate random test cases with n=10 and let the BS(block Size) to be around 2 or 3(anything less than 10).I think it would generate same situation as it would for BS=1000 & n>1000.
But, I have tried all cases with BS less than 10 & n=10 and n=10e6 and BS=1000 I have find all my test cases to match with AC Solution 
I myself have posted an editorial on this problem using sqrt decomposition approach which you may refer, alongwith my solution from following link…
PS: Do tell me what’s the error in your code if u find it. I’m interested
By the way, @anushi I have found the failing test case for you solution id 15886711
Run this test case whith BS = 5
1
12 1
2 5 6 7 2 6 8 8 11 12 10 12
? 4 6 13
Correct answer is 4 while your code gives 5.
Enjoy Debugging 
Feel free to ask anything…
The bug is below, whenever you are ready…
Click to view
You just forgot a +1 
In the query function it should be l = (it!=sz) ? block[id][it]+1 : block[id][sz-1]+1
1 Like
@meooow why did you spoil the fun of debugging. As i believe, you ought to give her a chance to debug her code. She only asked for test cases where her code was failing. It would have helped her learn to debug…
I knew the bug in code, but i didn’t reveal it for this reason…
Not accusing or anything… Just expressed my view…
Yes I think you are right, she did just ask for test cases. I am making it hidden, she can see it if she wants.
@anushi the above hidden comment has the bug of your code, view it after giving your code a try…
By the way, thanks @meooow for that
No problem, I get it
1 Like
@taran_1407 The whole purpose of using that hide content feature (so that she has to click to see) is to give her a chance to debug. And its better to allow her/him/whatever to see the answer if he/she/XYZ gets frustrated with debugging. So, yes, its all cool I guess