COPS - Editorial

PROBLEM LINK:

Author: Devendra Agarwal
Tester: Surya Kiran
Editorialist: Amit Pandey

Cakewalk

None

PROBLEM:

There are 100 houses in a lane, numbered from 1 to 100. N cops are positioned in some houses. A cop’s running speed is h houses per second and he can run for at max t secs. Find number of houses where a thief can hide such that he won’t be caught by any of the cops.

QUICK EXPLANATION:

For each house and each cop, we can check whether the cop can reach the house or not by checking whether distance between them is less than or equal to maximum distance a cop can travel (h * t). If some cop can reach a house, then the house is unsafe otherwise it is safe.

The editorial explains three methods of finding number of safe houses having time complexities of \mathcal{O}(H N), \mathcal{O}(H \, log N) and \mathcal{O}(H + N) respectively, where H denotes number of houses (is fixed to 100 in our problem) and N denotes the number of cops.

Explanation

For a particular house, we want to find out whether this house can be checked by some cop or not. We know that a cop can cover a maximum of h * t inter-house distances in t secs. So, if the distance between the thief’s hiding house and cop’s house is less than or equal to h * t, then the cop can catch the thief. We just need to check whether the current house can be reached by any of the cops or not. If yes, then it is not safe otherwise it is safe.

So, we can describe the solution succinctly as follows.

ans = 0
for each house from 1 to 100:
safe = true
for each cop houses from 1 to N:
if (the cop can reach the house)
safe = false
if (safe) ans += 1


Clearly the above implementation of the problem will take \mathcal{O}(100 * N) time.

Faster Solution

Let us say thief is currently at house p and we want to check whether he will be safe in this house or not. If we can find the nearest cops in both directions of the lane from current house, then we just need to check whether these nearest cops in either direction can reach the house p in time or not.

We will describe a method for finding nearest cop in forward direction faster than \mathcal{O}(N) time. Backward direction can be handled similarly.

Let us can create a sorted array of houses of cops. We want to find the first element in the array having value \geq p. This can be done by using binary search over the array. Time complexity of this will be \mathcal{O}(N) per search operation in array.

You can also find the same thing using \mathtt{lower}_\mathtt{bound} in set in C++. set maintain a balanced binary search tree underneath it, which takes \mathcal{O}(log N) time for each \mathtt{lower}_\mathtt{bound} query.

So, this solution runs in \mathcal{O}(100 * log N) time. Can we make it faster?

Even Faster Solution

We have to find nextCopHouse/prevCopHouse information for each house faster. Let us see how can find nextCopHouse information faster. Let us make a boolean array isCop of size 100 where isCop[i] denotes that there is a cop in i-th house or not.

Now, we go from house number 100 to 1 and update the nextCopHouse information by maintaining the position of latest house having cop in it.

latestHouseHavingCop = -1;
for house p from 100 to 1:
if (there is a cop in the house):
latestHouseHavingCop = p;
nextCopHouse[p] = latestHouseHavingCop;


Time complexity of this solution is \mathcal{O}(N + 100).

AUTHOR’S, TESTER’S SOLUTIONS:

2 Likes

I was getting wrong answer during submission, please help!! Here’s my code: https://www.codechef.com/viewplaintext/7508760

i am unable to understand why i am getting wa. need help
here is link to my soln:
https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/7510253
I got ac by changing cin to scanf and cout to printf…Can any one explain why such things happen?

i tried to do it in O(m). Why is this worng? https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/7506909

@sidharth14163 just check for a case
1
1 2 1
100
your first condition of breaking the loop is wrong .
hope it would be clear

Did this with hashing
This loop takes care of all possible boundary conditions.

for(i=0 to m)
{
input val:
for(j = max(val-x*y,0) ;j<=min(val+x*y,100);j++)
arr[j]++;
}


Now just check how many entries of arr are 0.

Why am I getting wrong answer?Here is the link https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/10048264

1 Like

test_cases = gets.to_i
test_cases.times do
m, x, y = gets.strip.split(" “).collect(&:to_i)
prod = x * y
all_houses = (1…100).to_a
cops_houses = gets.strip.split(” ").collect(&:to_i)
searchable_houses = []
cops_houses.each do |el|
searchable_houses += ((el - prod)…el).to_a + (el…(el + prod)).to_a
end
safe_houses = all_houses - searchable_houses
puts safe_houses.length
end

My code isnt working despite correct logic. Pls help.

https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/13138859

where to ask questions?

1 Like

I just made a boolean array with 100 elements. For each cop position I checked ±20 positions and then counted how many false positions there were. I’m pretty sure it’s a better solution since you don’t have to check every house.

somebody please help!! i dont get what wrong in my code(python). please…
https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/15429435

Well, You may have a look at my code

variable m denotes the product, left holds the house number till we have checked and covered, and 100+m+1 is added to check for houses in the end, like 100, 99 …

Rest code is self-explanatory (java)

https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/15431189

(Solved this for you)

Please UPVOTE…

Feel free to ask anything

Well,the question and explanation in the example do not correlate .The question says in a straight line,a cop in a house can go left or right but not both whereas the explanation uses the range on either sides makig it a Simpler problem

guyz here is a very easy solution in c++,go through it

#include
using namespace std;
struct dis
{
int max,min;

};
int main() {
int t,m,x,y,p;
cin>>t;
for(int i=0;i<t;i++)
{
cin>>m>>x>>y;
p=x*y;
int a[m];
int safe=0,h=0;

for(int j=0;j<m;j++)
{
cin>>a[j];
}
sort(a,a+m);
dis b[m];
int s,d;
for(int j=0;j<m;j++)
{
s=a[j]-p;// min
d=a[j]+p; //max
if(d>=100)
{b[j].max=100;}
else
b[j].max=d;

if(s<=1)

{b[j].min=1;}
else
b[j].min=s;
}
for(int j=0;j<m-1;j++)
{
if(b[j].max==100)
{
break;
}
if(b[j+1].min>b[j].max)
{
h=b[j+1].min-b[j].max-1;
safe=safe+h;
}
}
safe=safe+(b[0].min-1)+(100-b[m-1].max);
cout<<safe<<endl;


}

return 0;


}

Better one I guess,never tried though

1. Hash the cop houses,better than Sorting(simply compensating the 400 bytes(sizeof(int)*100) for computing speed).
2. Consider the fact that Total Distance traveled by any cop is Distance=Number_Of_Houses_per_minute times Total_Time.
3. For any cop house consider that range inclusive [cop_house-Distance,cop_house+Distance] to be cop houses.
4. If there are any more left houses that is not included in the range,those are the best houses for the thief to hide.

Note:-

• For 100th cop house exclude right boundary.
• Step 4 can we achieved by some math directly for houses that aren’t in the range.

Is the time complexity correct?

Under faster solution its written - “Let us can create a sorted array of houses of cops.” Wouldn’t creating a sorted array contribute O(nlogn) to the total time? How is it just O(100*logn)

@keertika32 I think you made an error in the inner for loop that is iterating from j=0 to j=4. Can you explain why you did that?

If problem related then here , Else than on discuss

I have used prefix sum or something is better than that?

//