 # CHGCDG - Editorial

Setter- Kirill Gulin
Tester- Ivan Safonov
Editorialist- Abhishek Pandey

EASY

### PROBLEM:

Given an array A of N integers, we have to maximize the GCD of all elements of the array. To do that, you can select any array element A_i which is divisible by any number {d}^{2}, divide it by {d}^{2} and multiply any other array element by d.

### QUICK EXPLANATION:

Key to AC- Realize that manipulation of powers of one prime is independent of powers of other primes. Perceiving that this question is more about manipulating prime and their powers rather than some complex mathematics theorem was important.

Make a list of primes, and smallest prime divisors of all numbers in range using sieve. Now, for each prime p_i, keep a note of how many array elements are divisible by it, and what is the power of p_i in their prime factorization form. Now whats left is finding what power of this prime can we maximum achieve in final answer using above operations - we can use BSH (Binary Search Heuristics) for this. Repeat for all primes and get an AC :).

### EXPLANATION:

This editorial is divided into 2 sections. The first section will highlight on the pre-processing required, and the second section will feature how to calculate answers using Binary Search Heuristics (BSH).

Note that, I assume you all realize that, using operation of same number (i.e. dividing the same element by {d}^{2} and increasing it by d) is useless. It will just reduce the prime power of that prime, which we might want to maximize for GCD.

1. Pre-processing-

It seems kind of obvious that we might need factorization of elements. Also, usually such problems do involve manipulation of prime numbers. Hence the first step is to use sieve of erastothenes to pre-calculate-

• Prime numbers in range [1,{10}^{6}]
• The smallest prime factor of a given number. This ensures O(LogN) factorization of elements.

The observation to make is that manipulation of exponents of prime factors of A_i are independent. We can choose a prime d every time for our operation so that only the chosen prime gets affected. If this doesnt ring a bell, you can refer to tab below.

Click to view

Now, observe this thing by thinking in terms of prime numbers. You’d notice that, increasing or decreasing power of one prime by above operation has no effect on power of other primes. In other words, manipulation of primes is independent of one another. Changing exponent of one prime factor of A_i will have no effect on exponent of other prime factors if d is prime. Only the chosen prime power will get affected.

This is important as it helps in realizing that, increasing GCD prime by prime is the way to go. It gives an intuition that - “Ok, initialize GCD=1 for now. Lets pick a prime. Let me see what is the maximum possible power of it I can get for GCD of array using above operations. Multiply answer by it. Lets repeat this until we get answer.”

What is the next thing we need if we are to do such manipulations? We’d need the prime numbers and their exponents for all elements of array. I specifically liked the tester’s method of storing it (to use it later) and I think it can use some credit .Its in tab below for reference.

Click to view
``````for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
while (a[i] > 1)//Factorize a[i]
{
int p = mn[a[i]];
int k = 0;
while (a[i] % p == 0)
{
a[i] /= p;
k++;
}
id[p].push_back(k);//Some array element as an exponent k for prime p.
}
}
``````

This is especially nice because now you can also find how many array elements are divisible by p in O(1) time by idx[p].size().

2. Binary Search Heuristics-

I hope that the intuition so far, especially that of manipulating prime by prime, is clear to you.

Now, for each prime, we will Binary Search on the highest possible power achievable (of that prime) in the final GCD. It is actually quite simple.

Lets say we have to check if a power k is achievable for some prime p. How do we do it? Recall that using our operation, we can reduce the power of p in some A_i by 2 and increase power in another A_i by 1. In a way, its like “Sacrifice 2 powers of some A_i for 1 power in another element.” Since we aim to calculate Gcd, our aim is to maximize the minimum power p.

Now, we have to check if we can make exponent of p equal to k in GCD. Hence, it makes sense to calculate how much “excess exponent” of p can we take from "rich A_i", and how much exponent do we need to "poor A_i" to make exponent of p equal to k in GCD.

It can be elegantly done if you have pre-processed the exponents and primes like tester did. The tester used a vector `idx` where idx[p] had “Exponents of p which are >0 among all elements of array.” Hence, he can simply loop over idx[p] and calculate the excess and deficit exponents. (Do not forget that we are currently checking if we can achieve an exponent of k in GCD).

Now, things are quite simple. If we have gained sufficient exponent from "Rich A_i" to give to "Poor A_i", then a power of at least k is achievable in the final GCD. We check for the highest power achievable using binary search (proof in tab below).

Click to view

Say, we are checking for power k. Either we can achieve it, or we cannot achieve it. If we achieve it, we can discard checking for ALL powers in range [0,k-1] as if exponent k is achievable, then exponents <k are obviously achievable as well. If we cannot achieve k, then any exponent greater than k is also not achievable. Hence, the condition of Binary Search holds which allows its use.

The code to implement this is given below Click to view
``````for (int x : prime)//For all primes
if (!id[x].empty()) // we can do operations for all primes independently, x - current prime
{
int l = 0;
int r = 0;
for (int k : id[x]) r = max(r, k + 1);//Find upper bound. r= Max exponent+1
int num0 = n - id[x].size();//num0 = number of array elements with 0 exponent of x
while (r - l > 1) // binary search for maximum possible power of x in answer
{
int h = (l + r) >> 1; // check x^h
int now = 0;
for (int k : id[x])
if (k >= h)//Find excess power
now += ((k - h) >> 1); // sum, that we can use
for (int k : id[x])
if (k < h)//Find deficit power.
now -= (h - k); // sum, that we need
now -= num0 * h; // sum, that we need
//-num0 *h accounts for deficit exponent for Ai where exponent of x is 0.
if (now >= 0)
l = h;
else
r = h;
}
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++) ans *= x;//multiply answer by x^l
}
``````

### SOLUTION:

The solutions are also pasted in tab below for you guys to see. Please refer to them in case links dont work. @admin may need time to link solutions up Setter

Click to view
``````#include <bits/stdc++.h>

using namespace std;

const int maxl = (int)1e6 + 10;

int lp[maxl];
int cnt[maxl];
vector <int> d[maxl];

bool can(int n, int md, const vector <int> &d) {
int need = md * (n - (int)d.size());
for(int x: d) {
if (x < md) need += md - x;
else need -= (x - md) / 2;
}
return need <= 0;
}

int main() {
lp = 1;
for(int i = 2; i < maxl; ++i) {
if (lp[i] > 0) continue;
for(int j = i; j < maxl; j += i) {
if (lp[j] == 0) lp[j] = i;
}
}
ios_base::sync_with_stdio(0);
int t;
cin >> t;
while(t--) {
int n;
cin >> n;
memset(cnt, 0, sizeof cnt);
for(int i = 1; i < maxl; ++i) {
d[i].clear();
}
for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
int x;
cin >> x;
while(x > 1) {
int p = lp[x];
int c = 0;
while(x > 1 && x % p == 0) x /= p, c++;
d[p].push_back(c);
cnt[p] += c;
}
}
int gcd = 1;
for(int p = 2; p < maxl; ++p) {
if (cnt[p] < n) continue;
int lf = -1, rg = 20;
while(rg - lf > 1) {
int md = (lf + rg) / 2;
if (md == -1 || can(n, md, d[p])) {
lf = md;
} else rg = md;
}
//lf now is the maximum power of p in gcd
while(lf--) gcd *= p;
}
cout << gcd << '\n';
}
return 0;
}
``````

Tester

Click to view
``````#include <bits/stdc++.h>
#include <cassert>

using namespace std;

typedef long long ll;
typedef long double ld;

long long readInt(long long l,long long r,char endd){
long long x=0;
int cnt=0;
int fi=-1;
bool is_neg=false;
while(true){
char g=getchar();
if(g=='-'){
assert(fi==-1);
is_neg=true;
continue;
}
if('0'<=g && g<='9'){
x*=10;
x+=g-'0';
if(cnt==0){
fi=g-'0';
}
cnt++;
assert(fi!=0 || cnt==1);
assert(fi!=0 || is_neg==false);

assert(!(cnt>19 || ( cnt==19 && fi>1) ));
} else if(g==endd){
assert(cnt>0);
if(is_neg){
x= -x;
}
assert(l<=x && x<=r);
return x;
} else {
assert(false);
}
}
}

string ret="";
int cnt=0;
while(true){
char g=getchar();
assert(g!=-1);
if(g==endd){
break;
}
cnt++;
ret+=g;
}
assert(l<=cnt && cnt<=r);
return ret;
}

long long readIntSp(long long l,long long r){
}

long long readIntLn(long long l,long long r){
}

}

}
// end

const int M = 1e5 + 239;
const int X = 1e6 + 239;

int n, a[M], mn[X];
vector<int> id[X];
vector<int> prime;

void solve()
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
if (i < n - 1)
else
}
for (int x : prime) id[x].clear();
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
while (a[i] > 1)
{
int p = mn[a[i]];
int k = 0;
while (a[i] % p == 0)
{
a[i] /= p;
k++;
}
id[p].push_back(k);
}
}
int ans = 1;
for (int x : prime)
if (!id[x].empty()) // we can do operations for all primes independently, x - current prime
{
int l = 0;
int r = 0;
for (int k : id[x]) r = max(r, k + 1);
int num0 = n - id[x].size();
while (r - l > 1) // binary search for maximum possible power of x in answer
{
int h = (l + r) >> 1; // check x^h
int now = 0;
for (int k : id[x])
if (k >= h)
now += ((k - h) >> 1); // sum, that we can use
for (int k : id[x])
if (k < h)
now -= (h - k); // sum, that we need
now -= num0 * h; // sum, that we need
if (now >= 0)
l = h;
else
r = h;
}
for (int i = 0; i < l; i++) ans *= x;
}
cout << ans << "\n";
}

int main()
{
memset(mn, -1, sizeof(mn));
for (int i = 2; i < X; i++)
if (mn[i] == -1)
{
prime.push_back(i);
for (int j = i; j < X; j += i)
if (mn[j] == -1)
mn[j] = i;
}
while (T--) solve();
assert(getchar() == -1);
return 0;
}
``````

Time Complexity= O((K+N)logN) where K is number of primes in given constraints of A_i

### CHEF VIJJU’S CORNER 1. Is this problem solvable if we raise constraint of A_i to 1 \le A_i \le {10}^{9}?

2. Usually, many problems using GCD need knowledge of Mobius Function, Euler Totient functions etc. There is a very good blog describing them here

3. Linear Sieve deserves a mention here. 4. Prove that you can get an AC by this approach-

Click to view

Another possible solution:

Let g be gcd of initial numbers. Make a[i] = a[i] / g. Now, New gcd = 1.

Now consider only primes until 100 to find the new solution. We will not be able to add any prime > 100 after the 2nd step. let d be a prime > 100 such that {d}^{2} is divisible by A[i], then if we divide this A[i] by {d}^{2} then A[i] will no longer be divisible by d. Let the answer for A[i]/g be denoted by ans

Final solution: ans * g.

For above approach, solve the following-

• This approach considers only first 100 prime number. Validate and comment on its correctness. “Proof by AC” not accepted.
• Can this approach be extended to A_i \le {10}^{9}. Why/Why not?
• What is the lower bound on number of primes to consider for making it useful for A_i <{10}^{9} and A_i <{10}^{18}?

Credits for this question to - @codebreaker123

5 Likes

problem links are pointing to different problem bro. Nice work btw

Difference between (Line 135) ( `lli mid=l+(r-l)/2` and `lli mid=l+(r-l+1)/2` ) deserves a mention in CHEF VIJJU’S CORNER.

Thanks for telling that. The time in hand to prepare editorials was lesser than a drop of sand xD

Done. xDDD

Thank you @aryanc403.I will check other editorials as well.

1 Like

Infinite loop? XD

Yes. xDDDD .
P.S. - Realised one more advantage of xD - bypass limit of 10 character. xD

1 Like

I missed the trick for storing lowest prime divisor for non primes. Good one!

Yes, it guarantees factorization in LogN time. Glad you learned something from the editorial 1 Like

Why does the condition in the binary search use (r - l > 1) instead of (r > l)?

There are many variants of binary search. Nothing special in that condition.

Its that, if r-l=1, then mid will always be equal to l. Might result in infinite loop. So setter kept r= Max Possible Value+1 (i.e, our answer is between [l,r) instead of [l,r]).

i think the complexity should be k.N.logN, please correct if i am wrong.

2 Likes

Nicely Explained! Keep it up bro Can anyone help me with my solution?

another possible solution:

1. let g <- gcd of initial numbers

2. make a[i] = a[i] / g. new gcd = 1.

3. Now consider only primes until 100 to find the new solution. We will not be able to add any prime > 100 after the 2nd step. let d be a prime > 100 such that d^2 is divisible by A[i], then if we divide this A[i] by d^2 then A[i] will no longer be divisible by d. let the answer for A[i]/g -> ans

final solution: ans * g.

This can be extended for A[i] <= 10^9 (by considering primes upto 1000).

let me know if I am wrong.

8 Likes

https://www.codechef.com/viewsolution/19318590

using setter solution but only considering primes until 100. 1 Like

it does not matter. storing any prime would suffice as smallest prime = 2. So in each iteration number n is getting reduced to atmost n/2, therby guaranteeing factorization in log(n).

The tester solution is showing runtime error in my IDE.

Good job. ``````This can be extended for A[i] <= 10^9.
``````

I doubt that. The reason is that your assumption - ` let d be a prime > 100 such that d^2 is divisible by A[i], then if we divide this A[i] by d^2 then A[i] will no longer be divisible by d.` will not hold.

Currently, A_i \le {10}^{6}, so say if p>100. If we say that A_i is divisible by p even after dividing by {p}^{2}, then A_i \ge {p}^{3} \implies A_i > {100}^{3} (as p>100) \implies A_i >{10}^{6}. Since A_i \le {10}^{6}, this means p<100

This will not hold for {10}^{9}

//